1/1/2023 0 Comments Intervalo beaconFirst, while Nest WiFi does provide clients with some extra information they can use to make better decisions about which band to connect to, which access point to connect to, and when to switch, clients are still in charge of those decisions. Wonder if anyone has tried using higher beacon intervals to force a laptop to use 5Ghz over 2.4Ghz? Or I have misunderstood the effects of changing Beacon Interval on the device? as that supposedly should favour 5Ghz where reception is strong. So basically I am at the mercy of the wifi card and Nest to randomly decide whether to use 2.4Ghz or 5Ghz.Īfter reading about beacon interval, have changed the beacon interval for the adaptor in Windows from 100 to 300. Intervalo beacon driver#Also the Windows driver for this wifi card does not allow me to prevent it from connecting to 2.4Ghz, although I have selected it to "prefer 5Ghz". but later I might notice it back on 2.4Ghz. Sometimes I see it connected to 5Ghz at 149. So since switching to Nest, where I can't select channel for 5Ghz, it seems to use channel 149 for 5Ghz and sure enough I find this one laptop often choosing 2.4Ghz even though I am sitting next to one of the Nest wifi points. But with Nest I have lost that capability to pre-select the channel (and the same SSID used for both bands). When I reduced the 5Ghz channel on the router the laptop was much more likely to connect to 5Ghz. With my old router setup (pre-nest) I could that one of my laptops with Realtek RTL8822CE wifi card would often choose to connect to 2.4Ghz SSID rather than connect to 5Ghz SSID if the 5Ghz setting was any channel above 48. if everything is working well now.I recognise Google Nest does not support users choosing which channels are offered by Nest across both 2.4 and 5 Ghz and that it offers both bands with exact same SSID. Intervalo beacon upgrade#I was going to upgrade to 802.11n (Buffalo WZR-HP-G300N with the Buffalo DD-WRT firmware), but at these speeds I think I may just stick with 802.11g for the time being, esp. My understanding is that this is close to the real-world max of standard 802.11g, but nonetheless it's a 40% increase to what I was getting before.Ĭan it really be that easy, just by reducing the Beacon Interval? Intervalo beacon pro#However, what I've also noticed is that with these 802.11g access points, my MacBook Pro speeds WiFi have gone from 16ish Mbps (but with lots of fluctuation) to 22-23 Mbps (usually solid above 20 Mbps in the same room). We'll see if the problem is completely gone or not with time, but the situation has certainly improved. So far this seems to have greatly reduced the problem. I also noticed this from time to time on the iPhone 4.įinally, I saw a couple of mentions online to reduce the Beacon Interval on the access points to 50 (from the default of 100). Setting a fixed IP address reduced the issues but didn't eliminate them. Checking the WiFi settings on the iPad, it looked like it was sometimes losing the DHCP IP lease, but even if it had the lease sometimes I couldn't get onto the net. I tried all sorts of security combinations and various settings on the APs to no avail. To get it back I'd have to either cycle off/on WiFi, or else try to renew the DHCP lease. after sleep, I'd lose connectivity between the iPad and the net. I'd been having problems with reliability with my Trendnet access points (TEW-432BRP and TEW-452BRP) mating with my iOS devices, particularly the iPad 2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |